首页> 外文OA文献 >The Rise of Mobile Computing for Group Decision Support Systems:A Comparative Evaluation of Mobile and Desktop
【2h】

The Rise of Mobile Computing for Group Decision Support Systems:A Comparative Evaluation of Mobile and Desktop

机译:集群决策支持系统的移动计算的兴起:移动和桌面的比较评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of desktop technologies, opposed to their mobile counterparts, is still predominant in the business domain and daily corporate activities. For complex business tasks, the usability of mobile applications is still perceived as inferior. Nevertheless, mobile computing could support work activities in different ways. This research seeks to explore whether mobile applications, especially sophisticated real-time groupware such as Group Decision Support Systems can match or even outperform their desktop-based counterparts regarding task performance and user satisfaction. To provide a more comprehensive comparison, two widely used web metric frameworks, HEART and PULSE (the former focusing on human behaviour and the latter focusing on technology), have been used to evaluate and compare a web-based mobile group decision support app with its desktop counterpart on a chair-led multi-step decision-making process in lab settings and real-world contexts. Moreover, data from web tracking tools and system logs of these two apps have been analyzed to deepen the level of analysis. Therefore, an innovative methodology for usability research combining lab experiments with long-term web observations is proposed. The results have shown that users interacting with the mobile version of the system had a steeper learning curve than users interacting with the desktop one. After a short practice period, participants using the mobile version of the groupware could perform as efficiently as participants using its desktop counterpart. Not only both the mobile and the desktop version of the app were used effectively for the group decision tasks chosen for this study, but also the two versions of the application were rated similarly in terms of user satisfaction. Furthermore, the mobile version had a faster adoption, better engagement, and better retention than its desktop counterpart. Despite an additional groupware middleware layer and a sophisticated user interface rendering layer, both groupware versions have yielded a user-to-user response time sufficient for real-time group interactions. These results convey important implications; as society is quickly moving towards mobile computing, web-based mobile technologies can now support multi-step group decision-making tasks.
机译:与移动设备相对,台式机技术的使用仍然在商业领域和日常公司活动中占主导地位。对于复杂的业务任务,仍然认为移动应用程序的可用性较低。但是,移动计算可以以不同的方式支持工作活动。这项研究旨在探讨在任务性能和用户满意度方面,移动应用程序,尤其是诸如Group Decision Support Systems之类的复杂实时组件是否可以匹配甚至优于其基于桌面的同类产品。为了提供更全面的比较,已经使用了两个广泛使用的Web指标框架HEART和PULSE(前者专注于人类行为,后者着重于技术)来评估和比较基于Web的移动群体决策支持应用程序及其在实验室环境和实际环境中,由主席主持的多步骤决策过程中的桌面副本。此外,已经对来自这两个应用程序的Web跟踪工具和系统日志中的数据进行了分析,以加深分析水平。因此,提出了一种将实验室实验与长期网络观测相结合的可用性研究的创新方法。结果表明,与移动版本的系统进行交互的用户比与桌面版本的用户具有更陡峭的学习曲线。经过短暂的练习,使用移动版本的组件的参与者可以像使用其桌面副本的参与者一样高效地执行任务。不仅为该研究选择的小组决策任务有效地使用了该应用程序的移动版本和桌面版本,而且在用户满意度方面,该应用程序的两个版本都得到了相似的评价。此外,与台式机相比,移动版具有更快的采用率,更好的参与度和更好的保留性。尽管有额外的群件中间件层和复杂的用户界面呈现层,这两种群件版本都产生了足以进行实时组交互的用户间响应时间。这些结果具有重要意义。随着社会迅速向移动计算迈进,基于Web的移动技术现在可以支持多步骤小组决策任务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号